<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Online Guide to Faith in the Workplace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/</link>
	<description>Connecting Business Life with Spiritual Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:41:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Goodyear</title>
		<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Goodyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/?p=1860#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>How did I miss this?! What a great service you do here, Bradley. More mommies than managers... indeed. You made me laugh out loud at that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did I miss this?! What a great service you do here, Bradley. More mommies than managers&#8230; indeed. You made me laugh out loud at that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim hancock</title>
		<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>jim hancock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/?p=1860#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>Bradley, thanks for your kind words about InsideWork and thanks for the survey you so thoughtfully prepared. 

I&#039;m glad your voice is part of this important conversation and grateful every time you lend it to us!

jh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bradley, thanks for your kind words about InsideWork and thanks for the survey you so thoughtfully prepared. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad your voice is part of this important conversation and grateful every time you lend it to us!</p>
<p>jh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donkimrey</title>
		<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>donkimrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/?p=1860#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>Brad:  I really like how this gentleman thinks and expresses himself.  I hate that he doesn&#039;t blog.  My impression is that we could all learn a great deal from him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad:  I really like how this gentleman thinks and expresses himself.  I hate that he doesn&#8217;t blog.  My impression is that we could all learn a great deal from him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donkimrey</title>
		<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/#comment-1627</link>
		<dc:creator>donkimrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/?p=1860#comment-1627</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to commend you for staying focused.  Your objectives were stated clearly at the outset, and I feel you&#039;ve stayed on task.  I&#039;ve watched other sites get cluttered, become argumentative,or take off on some tangents or try to keep too many plates in the air at the same time. There is something to be said for concentrating. I&#039;ve decided to allow other people to do the things they are best qualified to do.  For my part, my plan is to stay with the originally stated intention. Don&#039;t remember where he said it, but I think Paul wrote: &quot;This One thing I do...&quot; I&#039;m not a good multi-tasker.  dk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to commend you for staying focused.  Your objectives were stated clearly at the outset, and I feel you&#8217;ve stayed on task.  I&#8217;ve watched other sites get cluttered, become argumentative,or take off on some tangents or try to keep too many plates in the air at the same time. There is something to be said for concentrating. I&#8217;ve decided to allow other people to do the things they are best qualified to do.  For my part, my plan is to stay with the originally stated intention. Don&#8217;t remember where he said it, but I think Paul wrote: &#8220;This One thing I do&#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;m not a good multi-tasker.  dk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shrinkingthecamel</title>
		<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>shrinkingthecamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/?p=1860#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>Randy - Thanks for the encouragement, bro! Let&#039;s keep on keepin&#039; on. And &quot;Made to Mutter&quot; does have a catchy ring to it... and second thoughts on that?

And Nancy - I forgot to address your sassy remark in my last comment, but yes, you are right. Our mommies were our first managers, so they deserve to be in the mix right along with the rest of us. Good catch.

Deb, thanks for stopping by and supporting us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy &#8211; Thanks for the encouragement, bro! Let&#8217;s keep on keepin&#8217; on. And &#8220;Made to Mutter&#8221; does have a catchy ring to it&#8230; and second thoughts on that?</p>
<p>And Nancy &#8211; I forgot to address your sassy remark in my last comment, but yes, you are right. Our mommies were our first managers, so they deserve to be in the mix right along with the rest of us. Good catch.</p>
<p>Deb, thanks for stopping by and supporting us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deb</title>
		<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/?p=1860#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>As neither a corporate or biblical expert... I still know that this is a truly good and powerful thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As neither a corporate or biblical expert&#8230; I still know that this is a truly good and powerful thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Kilgore</title>
		<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Kilgore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/?p=1860#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>Bradley, I believe if you put your blog on a hosted website you&#039;d see a more accurate count of how many people are reading you.  Our site shows many more readers clicking over to David&#039;s blog than he actually sees showing up as hits on his blog.  We use a third party to audit our numbers, so we know they&#039;re solid.  Also, I understand another difference has something to do with search engine blocks on blogs that reappear on another site or which appear on &quot;blog-compositors&quot; like Wordpress. I&#039;m told some/all search engines &quot;switch off&quot; the ability to be found in searches for those blogs.  Now, I&#039;m talking WAY, WAY over my head technologically, but I got this from an IT professional who was designing search engine protocols back when I was trying to decide blog/no-blog.  

(BTW, I opted for no-blog because my battle with severe pain makes the spontaneity of blogging a dangerous outlet for me.  With the devotional, I NEVER print until I&#039;ve checked it against Scripture, made sure I didn&#039;t write it AT someone, and have let another pair of eyes peruse it for tone and spirit.  Otherwise, I&#039;d be known as thebiggrumpychristian or madetomutter, instead of Madetomatter.org. )

Anyway, before the pain limited the hours I can work, we were getting 100 emails/day from people eager for more informaton, or prayer, or with questions.  So please, don&#039;t any of you stop or get discouraged...&quot;the harvest is plentiful but the (unselfish) laborers are few.&quot; 

(NOTE: &quot;Unselfish&quot; doesn&#039;t appear in Jesus&#039; quote in Scripture.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bradley, I believe if you put your blog on a hosted website you&#8217;d see a more accurate count of how many people are reading you.  Our site shows many more readers clicking over to David&#8217;s blog than he actually sees showing up as hits on his blog.  We use a third party to audit our numbers, so we know they&#8217;re solid.  Also, I understand another difference has something to do with search engine blocks on blogs that reappear on another site or which appear on &#8220;blog-compositors&#8221; like WordPress. I&#8217;m told some/all search engines &#8220;switch off&#8221; the ability to be found in searches for those blogs.  Now, I&#8217;m talking WAY, WAY over my head technologically, but I got this from an IT professional who was designing search engine protocols back when I was trying to decide blog/no-blog.  </p>
<p>(BTW, I opted for no-blog because my battle with severe pain makes the spontaneity of blogging a dangerous outlet for me.  With the devotional, I NEVER print until I&#8217;ve checked it against Scripture, made sure I didn&#8217;t write it AT someone, and have let another pair of eyes peruse it for tone and spirit.  Otherwise, I&#8217;d be known as thebiggrumpychristian or madetomutter, instead of Madetomatter.org. )</p>
<p>Anyway, before the pain limited the hours I can work, we were getting 100 emails/day from people eager for more informaton, or prayer, or with questions.  So please, don&#8217;t any of you stop or get discouraged&#8230;&#8221;the harvest is plentiful but the (unselfish) laborers are few.&#8221; </p>
<p>(NOTE: &#8220;Unselfish&#8221; doesn&#8217;t appear in Jesus&#8217; quote in Scripture.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shrinkingthecamel</title>
		<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>shrinkingthecamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/?p=1860#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>Glad you all found this useful. As for the work-faith chasm, I did my share of whining in a post in early September, where I acknowledged the fact that my Blog was never going to grow very much because Faith in the Workplace is such a tiny niche that not too many people seem to care about.  http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/09/03/lord-wilt-thou-not-leadest-my-blog-to-reach-1000-page-views-per-day/

On the other hand, there really are a lot of people out there (like all of us!) who are addressing this subject. I am continually suprised by the new sites I come across all the time.  It just hasn&#039;t really ever gone mainstream, for whatever reason. 

So, yes, let&#039;s all keep doing what we&#039;re doing and making people more aware of the business-spiritual connection!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you all found this useful. As for the work-faith chasm, I did my share of whining in a post in early September, where I acknowledged the fact that my Blog was never going to grow very much because Faith in the Workplace is such a tiny niche that not too many people seem to care about.  <a href="http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/09/03/lord-wilt-thou-not-leadest-my-blog-to-reach-1000-page-views-per-day/" rel="nofollow">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/09/03/lord-wilt-thou-not-leadest-my-blog-to-reach-1000-page-views-per-day/</a></p>
<p>On the other hand, there really are a lot of people out there (like all of us!) who are addressing this subject. I am continually suprised by the new sites I come across all the time.  It just hasn&#8217;t really ever gone mainstream, for whatever reason. </p>
<p>So, yes, let&#8217;s all keep doing what we&#8217;re doing and making people more aware of the business-spiritual connection!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Benefiel</title>
		<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Benefiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/?p=1860#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>Bradley,

Thanks for the mention.  It&#039;s good to learn of you and your work.

Wishing you all the best,
Margaret Benefiel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bradley,</p>
<p>Thanks for the mention.  It&#8217;s good to learn of you and your work.</p>
<p>Wishing you all the best,<br />
Margaret Benefiel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Kilgore</title>
		<link>http://shrinkingthecamel.com/2009/11/09/your-online-guide-to-faith-in-the-workplace/#comment-1607</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Kilgore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkingthecamel.com/?p=1860#comment-1607</guid>
		<description>HOME RUN!  At the risk of sounding self-serving, this was a MOST HELPFUL piece on many levels, and I applaud your selections and your rationale.  Don&#039;t be surprised if this column is still getting visitors well into the future, it&#039;s that useful/helpful.  

I want to encourage David Rupert, too, publicly. (A good friend and GREAT writer at Red Letter Believers). In 1990, I was commissioned to examine over 800 titles written on work/faith, en route to recommending which were useful to working Christians. Literally, less than 10% were helpful, accurate and/or Biblically appropriate (and I was extremely loose in defining &quot;worth reading&quot; back then!)  And that was before the recent rash of titles (over 300 in three years, I&#039;m told) hit the shelves. Publishers have been burned by work/faith writers who 
(a) aren&#039;t careful with Scripture; 
(b) teach health/wealth or have joined the bandwagon addressing the narrow, narrow, narrow market of leaders in business who are Christians; or 
(c) trash the church or pastors, an act God simply will not honor. 

So it&#039;s harder to get published out there for now, but it will get loose again--and publishers ARE watching the leading writers/sites. There&#039;s a deep and abiding hunger among workers, I promise you, and it&#039;s global, but we&#039;ve had too much garbage/fluff/or heresy burning off people&#039;s attention for about five years.   By the way, if Bradley permits it, and I&#039;ll understand if he prefers not to...here&#039;s an article showing the cycle in work/faith history, with implications. 

http://www.madetomatter.org/articles_view.asp?columnid=4672&amp;articleid=48267</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOME RUN!  At the risk of sounding self-serving, this was a MOST HELPFUL piece on many levels, and I applaud your selections and your rationale.  Don&#8217;t be surprised if this column is still getting visitors well into the future, it&#8217;s that useful/helpful.  </p>
<p>I want to encourage David Rupert, too, publicly. (A good friend and GREAT writer at Red Letter Believers). In 1990, I was commissioned to examine over 800 titles written on work/faith, en route to recommending which were useful to working Christians. Literally, less than 10% were helpful, accurate and/or Biblically appropriate (and I was extremely loose in defining &#8220;worth reading&#8221; back then!)  And that was before the recent rash of titles (over 300 in three years, I&#8217;m told) hit the shelves. Publishers have been burned by work/faith writers who<br />
(a) aren&#8217;t careful with Scripture;<br />
(b) teach health/wealth or have joined the bandwagon addressing the narrow, narrow, narrow market of leaders in business who are Christians; or<br />
(c) trash the church or pastors, an act God simply will not honor. </p>
<p>So it&#8217;s harder to get published out there for now, but it will get loose again&#8211;and publishers ARE watching the leading writers/sites. There&#8217;s a deep and abiding hunger among workers, I promise you, and it&#8217;s global, but we&#8217;ve had too much garbage/fluff/or heresy burning off people&#8217;s attention for about five years.   By the way, if Bradley permits it, and I&#8217;ll understand if he prefers not to&#8230;here&#8217;s an article showing the cycle in work/faith history, with implications. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.madetomatter.org/articles_view.asp?columnid=4672&amp;articleid=48267" rel="nofollow">http://www.madetomatter.org/articles_view.asp?columnid=4672&amp;articleid=48267</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
